{"id":5368,"date":"2026-08-16T01:03:37","date_gmt":"2026-08-16T01:03:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/?p=5368"},"modified":"2026-08-11T08:08:19","modified_gmt":"2026-08-11T08:08:19","slug":"advantages-tube-printing-machinery-cosmetic-pharmaceutical","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/advantages-tube-printing-machinery-cosmetic-pharmaceutical\/","title":{"rendered":"Tube Printing Machinery: Key Advantages for Your Brand"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

The global tube packaging market was valued at\u00a0USD 13.4 billion in 2025<\/strong>\u00a0and is projected to reach\u00a0USD 21.9 billion by 2033<\/strong>, growing at a CAGR of approximately 5.6% (Grand View Research<\/a>). Inside that growth sits a brutal competitive reality: shelf space is finite, retail buyers are exacting, and the consumer purchasing decision happens in under four seconds of visual contact with a tube.<\/p>

The cosmetic brands and pharmaceutical packagers winning market share right now are not doing so with better formulas alone. They are doing it with better packaging \u2014 printed with the kind of precision, consistency, and speed that manual or outdated equipment simply cannot deliver.<\/p>

This guide is written specifically for manufacturers who buy machines to produce cosmetic or pharmaceutical tubes, distributors who help clients make those decisions, and agents who need to understand the real operational and financial stakes. You will find no generic marketing language here \u2014 only the data, scenarios, and operational realities that matter to your production floor and your bottom line.<\/p>

\"Screen<\/a><\/p>

Why Your Tube Printing Process May Be Costing You More Than You Realize<\/h2>

The Production Bottlenecks Slowing Down Your Growth<\/h3>

How manual printing methods drain your profit margins<\/h4>

A manual tube printing operator producing 600\u2013900 tubes per hour carries an all-in labor cost \u2014 wages, benefits, supervision, training, and downtime \u2014 that translates to approximately\u00a0$0.15\u2013$0.35 per tube in labor alone<\/strong>\u00a0at typical US and European wage rates. A mid-tier automated system printing 3,000\u20134,500 tubes per hour reduces that figure to\u00a0$0.04\u2013$0.12 per tube<\/strong>, with a single trained technician managing the entire line (Miyoda screen printing TCO analysis<\/a>).<\/p>

The gap does not stay theoretical. A cosmetic manufacturer running 100,000 tubes per month on manual equipment spends approximately\u00a0$128,500 per year<\/strong>\u00a0in total operating costs. The same volume on a fully automated line runs closer to\u00a0$95,900 per year<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 despite the higher upfront capital of the automated machine. The breakeven typically arrives within 18\u201324 months, after which every month represents compounding savings.<\/p>
Type de syst\u00e8me<\/th>Per-Unit Labor Cost<\/th>Annual Operating Cost (~100K tubes\/month)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Manual press<\/td>$0.15\u2013$0.35\/tube<\/td>~$128,500<\/td><\/tr>
Semi-automated<\/td>$0.08\u2013$0.18\/tube<\/td>~$106,500<\/td><\/tr>
Fully automated<\/td>$0.04\u2013$0.12\/tube<\/td>~$95,900<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>

Source: TCO benchmarks for cosmetic\/pharmaceutical tube printing at ~120,000 units\/month.<\/em><\/p>

How equipment downtime translates to missed deadlines and lost customers<\/h4>

A machine printing 1,000 tubes per hour at $0.35 blended revenue yield generates $350 per operating hour. Four hours of unplanned downtime \u2014 triggered by a worn squeegee, a UV lamp degrading without detection, or a registration system losing calibration \u2014 costs $1,400 in lost output before any overtime or expedited logistics costs are added.<\/p>

Manual and budget-tier machines in field conditions average\u00a015\u201330 hours of unplanned downtime per month<\/strong>, meaning manufacturers absorb $5,250\u2013$10,500 in monthly production losses that appear nowhere on their procurement comparison spreadsheet. For pharmaceutical clients with committed delivery dates, missed production windows also trigger contract penalty clauses and supplier qualification reviews \u2014 financial consequences that dwarf the production loss itself.<\/p>

Quality Issues That Damage Your Brand Reputation<\/h3>

The cost of reprints and customer returns from poor print quality<\/h4>

Typical defect rates on manual or semi-automated tube printing lines run\u00a03\u20138% of production volume<\/strong>. At a blended material and labor cost of $0.30 per tube, every 100,000 units produced generates $900\u2013$2,400 in direct waste from defective output alone. That figure excludes the cost of identifying defects, sorting tubes, managing rework queues, and explaining quality incidents to retail buyers.<\/p>

For a cosmetic brand selling into premium retail, a single batch rejection due to color inconsistency or registration error triggers an incoming inspection audit that can delay payment by 30\u201360 days \u2014 a working capital impact that small and mid-sized brands feel acutely.<\/p>

How inconsistent branding weakens market positioning<\/h4>

A \u0394E (Delta-E \u2014 a numerical measure of color difference; \u0394E < 1.0 is imperceptible to the human eye; \u0394E > 3.0 fails most premium cosmetic brand color standards) color deviation above 3.0 is visibly perceptible to consumers comparing two purchases of the same product. This is common in manual and low-specification automated systems where ink viscosity is not closed-loop controlled.<\/p>

Research in packaging psychology shows that color consistency is a primary cue consumers use to evaluate brand reliability \u2014 with color variation between purchases increasing perceived quality doubt even when the formula is identical (PMC consumer packaging perception study<\/a>). For a brand investing $15\u2013$40 per SKU in formula development, allowing an inadequate printing machine to undermine perceived quality is a poor return on the product investment.<\/p>

The Staffing Challenges That Keep You Stuck<\/h3>

Why finding skilled operators is becoming increasingly difficult<\/h4>

Qualified screen printing operators with sufficient skill to maintain consistent quality in multi-color tube applications require 6\u201312 weeks of productive training. Turnover in manual printing roles consistently runs\u00a025\u201340% annually<\/strong>\u00a0in manufacturing markets where production employment has alternatives. Every turnover event costs $4,000\u2013$8,000 in recruiting, onboarding, and lost productivity \u2014 a recurring cost that fully automated systems reduce to near-zero by minimizing the number of skilled operators the line requires.<\/p>

Training costs and human error that impact your bottom line<\/h4>

Manual printing processes are inherently operator-dependent. Registration accuracy, ink viscosity management, UV cure quality, and print pressure consistency are all functions of the individual operator’s skill and attention level \u2014 both of which degrade measurably over a long shift. Operations that track error rates by shift consistently find that defect rates in the final 90 minutes of a production shift run\u00a018\u201325% higher<\/strong>\u00a0than in the opening 90 minutes. Automated systems eliminate this variability by controlling critical parameters mechanically and electronically rather than through human judgment.<\/p>

How Modern Tube Printing Machinery Transforms Your Production Workflow<\/h2>

Dramatically Increased Production Speed and Output<\/h3>

How automated systems multiply your daily tube capacity<\/h4>

Modern automated tube printing presses \u2014 including the\u00a0dry offset and silk screen systems designed for cosmetic and pharmaceutical substrates<\/a>\u00a0from Miyoda Packaging Machinery \u2014 operate at 60\u2013120 tubes per minute in the small-to-mid range, and 200\u2013300 tubes per minute on high-volume industrial lines. Compared to manual throughput of 600\u2013900 tubes per hour, this represents a\u00a03\u20135\u00d7 increase in effective daily capacity<\/strong>\u00a0without proportional staffing increases.<\/p>

At 80 tubes per minute on a single 8-hour shift with realistic setup and changeover time factored in, a mid-tier automated press delivers approximately\u00a030,000\u201334,000 printed tubes per shift<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 the equivalent of 3\u20134 dedicated manual operators’ full-shift output, produced by one trained technician managing the line.<\/p>

Real-world example: manufacturer doubles output without doubling staff<\/h4>

A Southeast Asian cosmetic contract manufacturer running 8 SKUs on laminate tubes moved from a contract printing arrangement \u2014 where minimum order quantities forced 3-month inventory builds \u2014 to an in-house automated press. Their average inventory days per SKU dropped from 87 to 24. Packaging waste from print defects fell from 3.8% to 0.9%. And their ability to accept short-run client orders increased dramatically, because the machine’s 20-minute changeover made 2,000-unit batches economically viable \u2014 batches the contract printer would not take at any price.<\/p>

Precision Print Quality That Makes Your Products Stand Out<\/h3>

Multi-color printing capabilities that rival premium competitors<\/h4>

Modern automated tube printing presses achieve multi-color registration tolerances of\u00a00.2\u20130.5 mm<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 the threshold at which color registration is visually imperceptible to the human eye at normal viewing distance. This means 4-, 5-, and 6-color designs with fine gradients, Pantone-matched brand colors, fine serif text, and metallic spot elements can all be produced consistently at production speed.<\/p>

For a cosmetic brand producing a premium eye cream tube with a 5-color design including a metallic silver accent and sub-1mm fine print ingredient text, this level of precision enables visual parity with brands whose packaging was previously achievable only through contract printing at European-standard facilities \u2014 without the minimum order quantities or 6-week lead times.<\/p>

Consistency across every single tube \u2014 no more quality variance<\/h4>

Automated systems with closed-loop ink metering (where ink viscosity and volume per stroke are controlled electronically rather than manually) maintain color consistency within\u00a0\u0394E < 1.5<\/strong>\u00a0across production runs of 50,000+ tubes. Manual and entry-level systems in field conditions typically produce \u0394E 2.5\u20134.0 by the end of a long run as ink viscosity drifts and operator fatigue accumulates \u2014 a quality degradation that premium retailers consistently reject.<\/p>

Reduced Waste and Lower Cost Per Unit<\/h3>

How advanced registration systems minimize reprints and scrap<\/h4>

Servo-driven registration systems \u2014 where print station positioning is controlled electronically and self-corrects within each production cycle \u2014 reduce multi-color tube printing defect rates from the\u00a05\u201310% typical of manual systems<\/strong>\u00a0to\u00a0below 1%<\/strong>\u00a0on premium automated equipment. On a 50,000-tube production run, the difference between 7.5% and 0.8% defect rates is 3,350 additional saleable tubes \u2014 a direct margin improvement that appears in every batch shipped.<\/p>

Manufacturers implementing real-time scrap monitoring in automated production systems typically achieve\u00a015\u201320% reductions in total waste costs<\/strong>\u00a0within the first year, as consistent defect measurement reveals the specific process deviations driving the largest waste volumes.<\/p>

Energy-efficient technology that cuts operational expenses<\/h4>

Modern tube printing presses incorporate optimized UV curing systems with precisely metered lamp power matched to production speed, eliminating the energy waste of oversized curing systems running at constant maximum output. Extended production runs on automated lines also consolidate energy consumption per tube more efficiently than multiple manual workstations producing equivalent volume \u2014 a meaningful cost difference for manufacturers running 2\u20133 shifts on an ongoing basis.<\/p>

See It in Action: High-Speed Automatic Screen Printing on Cosmetic Tubes<\/h2>

Watch the precision and throughput of modern automated tube screen printing \u2014 note the ink laydown consistency, registration accuracy, and cycle speed that determine your per-unit production economics.<\/p>

\"Automatic<\/a><\/p>

Superior Print Quality as Your Competitive Advantage<\/h2>

Creating Premium Aesthetics That Justify Higher Prices<\/h3>

How vibrant, detailed prints elevate perceived product value<\/h4>

Packaging perception analysis consistently identifies print quality as a primary driver of perceived product value. High-quality, color-accurate packaging with premium visual cues influences consumer willingness to pay premiums of\u00a015\u201330%<\/strong>\u00a0versus equivalent products with generic or inconsistent packaging (Lisson Bottle packaging brand perception analysis<\/a>).<\/p>

For a cosmetic brand selling a 50 ml serum at $45 retail, print quality that justifies a premium positioning versus a $30 private-label competitor is worth several multiples of the machinery investment required to achieve it \u2014 particularly when that investment also reduces per-unit production cost simultaneously.<\/p>

Design flexibility that lets you differentiate from mass-market competitors<\/h4>

Modern automated tube printing machinery supports full-circumference printing on tubes from 16 mm to 60 mm in diameter, including LDPE, PP, ABL, PBL, and aluminum substrates \u2014 the complete range of materials used in cosmetic and pharmaceutical soft tube packaging. This substrate flexibility means a brand can shift from a PE sunscreen tube to an ABL barrier-laminate luxury face cream tube without requiring a different printing platform, preserving capital and maintaining consistency in the production team’s skills.<\/p>

Meeting Regulatory Requirements Without Compromise<\/h3>

Compliance printing for pharmaceutical and cosmetic labeling standards<\/h4>

FDA 21 CFR regulations for cosmetic labeling require that all mandatory label elements \u2014 ingredient declarations, net quantity, manufacturer identity, warnings \u2014 be legible, durable, and accurately positioned. For pharmaceutical tubes under cGMP (Current Good Manufacturing Practice \u2014 the FDA’s minimum quality standards for drug manufacturing and packaging), additional requirements cover lot number and expiry date placement, barcode scan readability, and documentation of print parameters per batch (FDA cosmetic labeling compliance summary<\/a>).<\/p>

Modern automated tube printing presses with servo-controlled print station positioning and UV-cure consistency monitoring deliver the precision and documentation trail these requirements demand \u2014 capabilities that manual and low-specification equipment cannot provide to audit standard.<\/p>

How modern machinery ensures legibility and accuracy for required information<\/h4>

Automated presses with integrated vision inspection systems verify character legibility, print position accuracy, and color density on every tube \u2014 not through random sampling, but through 100% inline inspection at production speed. For pharmaceutical clients, this eliminates the sampling-based quality control gap that represents the highest risk in batch release: the defective tube that the random sample missed. For cosmetic brands, it eliminates the incoming inspection rejection that arrives when defective tubes trigger a return authorization.<\/p>

Customization Capabilities for Market-Specific Campaigns<\/h3>

Quick changeovers for limited editions and seasonal products<\/h4>

The “launch-learn-iterate” cycle that now defines D2C and prestige cosmetic brand strategy requires packaging production infrastructure that can respond in weeks, not months. Modern automated tube printing presses with servo-indexed mandrel systems and digital color-preset recall complete job changeovers in\u00a015\u201325 minutes<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 enabling 3\u20134 SKU changeovers per shift without production bottlenecking. This makes short-run limited editions of 2,000\u20135,000 tubes economically viable where equivalent manual changeover times of 45\u201390 minutes make the same runs prohibitively expensive.<\/p>

Regional language and compliance variations made simple<\/h4>

A cosmetic brand distributing across multiple markets \u2014 where product labeling must appear in English, Arabic, French, and Spanish with market-specific compliance elements \u2014 can produce all variants on the same automated press in a single production day, loading a different registered print job per variant. The same task on manual printing infrastructure requires multiple setup days, separate plate\/screen preparation, and separate quality validation runs for each language version \u2014 adding 3\u20135 days of lead time and proportional labor cost per variant.<\/p>

Dramatic Cost Reduction Across Your Operation<\/h2>

Lower Per-Unit Production Costs<\/h3>

How automation eliminates expensive labor-intensive processes<\/h4>

The per-unit production cost difference between manual and automated tube printing is substantial and measurable. At production volumes above 150,000 tubes per month, the automated cost advantage becomes decisive. Automated systems reduce per-unit labor costs by\u00a040\u201360% compared to manual alternatives<\/strong>, and the savings compound annually because labor costs escalate with wage inflation while automation costs remain relatively stable.<\/p>

On a 50,000-tube monthly run where defect rate moves from 6% to 0.8% through automation \u2014 a saving of approximately 2,600 tubes per month \u2014 at a blended material and labor cost of $0.28 per tube, the direct waste reduction alone amounts to\u00a0$728\/month or $8,736\/year<\/strong>\u00a0from a single quality improvement. Scale to 500,000 tubes monthly and the waste reduction justifies a substantial equipment investment within 24 months.<\/p>

A realistic 5-year Total Cost of Ownership comparison<\/h4>
Cat\u00e9gorie de co\u00fbts<\/th>Manual System (5-yr)<\/th>Automated System (5-yr)<\/th>Net Position (Automated)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Equipment amortized<\/td>$28,500<\/td>$128,500<\/td>\u2013$100,000<\/td><\/tr>
Operator labor<\/td>$360,000<\/td>$90,000<\/td>+$270,000<\/td><\/tr>
Consumables (ink, screens)<\/td>$140,000<\/td>$165,000<\/td>\u2013$25,000<\/td><\/tr>
Planned maintenance<\/td>$21,000<\/td>$40,000<\/td>\u2013$19,000<\/td><\/tr>
Unplanned downtime losses<\/td>$93,000<\/td>$5,000<\/td>+$88,000<\/td><\/tr>
Defect waste (material + labor)<\/td>$90,000<\/td>$18,000<\/td>+$72,000<\/td><\/tr>
Total sur 5 ans<\/strong><\/td>$732,500<\/strong><\/td>$446,500<\/strong><\/td>+$286,000<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>

Illustrative TCO at ~120,000 tubes\/month. Use your actual wage rates and production volume for a specific projection \u2014 contact the team at Miyoda Packaging Machinery for a guided TCO analysis tailored to your operation.<\/em><\/p>

Minimized Equipment Maintenance and Downtime<\/h3>

Reliability that keeps your production line running consistently<\/h4>

Premium automated tube printing equipment \u2014 manufactured to engineered tolerance specifications with industrial-grade bearings, servo drives, and documented preventive maintenance schedules \u2014 achieves\u00a0less than 1 hour of unplanned downtime per month<\/strong>\u00a0in properly maintained production environments. This compares to 15\u201330 hours monthly for manual and budget-tier equipment.<\/p>

Planned preventive maintenance on premium automated presses costs approximately $3,000\u2013$6,000 annually in parts and labor. Emergency reactive repairs on manual\/budget equipment run $5,000\u2013$15,000 annually \u2014 and carry the production loss cost that planned maintenance never incurs. The math clearly favors planned investment over reactive repair.<\/p>

Predictive maintenance features that prevent costly surprises<\/h4>

Modern automated presses incorporate sensor-based monitoring of UV lamp intensity, squeegee pressure uniformity, servo drive load, and registration accuracy \u2014 generating alerts when parameters drift toward out-of-specification limits before defects appear in production output. This predictive approach eliminates the most expensive maintenance scenario: the failure discovered only when defective product has already shipped.<\/p>

Calculating Your Return on Investment<\/h3>

The payback period for tube printing machinery investment can be calculated with a straightforward formula:<\/p>

$$\\text{Payback Period (months)} = \\frac{\\text{Equipment Investment} \\times 12}{\\text{Annual Labor Savings} + \\text{Annual Waste Reduction} + \\text{Annual Downtime Recovery}}$$<\/p>

For a manufacturer investing $150,000 in an automated press and achieving $72,000 in annual labor savings, $18,000 in waste reduction, and $16,000 in downtime recovery:<\/p>

$$\\text{Payback} = \\frac{$150,000 \\times 12}{$72,000 + $18,000 + $16,000} = \\frac{$1,800,000}{$106,000} \\approx 17 \\text{ months}$$<\/p>

After 17 months, every subsequent month generates approximately $8,833 in net savings \u2014 compounding over the machine’s 10\u201315 year operating life. Industry experience consistently places payback timelines at\u00a012\u201318 months for high-volume operations<\/strong>\u00a0(200,000+ tubes monthly) and\u00a018\u201330 months for mid-volume operations<\/strong>\u00a0(50,000\u2013200,000 monthly).<\/p>

Solving the Scalability Challenge Without Major Capital Reinvestment<\/h2>

Growing Production Without Proportional Cost Increases<\/h3>

How modular systems let you scale incrementally<\/h4>

Modular tube printing machine architectures \u2014 where additional print stations, UV curing modules, or inspection systems can be added to an existing base machine without replacing the core platform \u2014 allow manufacturers to invest proportionally to demonstrated production demand rather than specifying for peak capacity on day one. A manufacturer starting with a 3-color automated press and adding a 4th color station 18 months later when a new client contract justifies the investment has avoided the capital risk of overspecification while retaining the full upgrade path.<\/p>

This modular scaling approach is particularly valuable for distributors and agents advising clients making their first serious equipment investment: it lowers the initial commitment barrier while preserving the client’s ability to grow on the same platform rather than facing a full replacement decision when volume grows.<\/p>

Avoiding the “growth trap” where expansion kills profitability<\/h4>

The growth trap in tube printing manufacturing occurs when volume increases require proportional headcount increases \u2014 each additional 50,000 units per month requires another operator, another workstation, another supervisor, and more floor space. At some point, the cost structure of this model makes it impossible to price competitively against manufacturers running automated lines. Automated tube printing machinery breaks this trap: volume can increase substantially \u2014 often 100\u2013200% \u2014 before staffing or floor space requires expansion, because the machines absorb volume growth through longer run times rather than additional equipment or labor.<\/p>

Flexibility to Respond to Market Demand<\/h3>

Quick adaptation to trending products and seasonal peaks<\/h4>

The cosmetic industry moves on seasonal and trend cycles that compress lead times to 6\u201310 weeks for responsive brands. A tube printing system that can accommodate a new SKU from artwork approval to first production run in under 48 hours \u2014 which modern automated presses with digital color-preset registration achieve \u2014 enables brands to participate in fast-moving trends that competitors with slower production infrastructure must pass on.<\/p>

For pharmaceutical contract manufacturers, new client onboarding speed is a competitive differentiator. A contract packer who can complete IQ\/OQ\/PQ validation for a new pharmaceutical client’s tube product within 8 weeks rather than 6 months \u2014 because the machine’s validation documentation package is pre-assembled and the print process is already characterized \u2014 wins contracts from competitors whose qualification timeline makes them uncompetitive for urgent projects.<\/p>

Ability to serve multiple customer segments from one production line<\/h4>

A single automated tube printing platform can serve cosmetic brands requiring vibrant multi-color designs, pharmaceutical clients requiring precise regulatory text printing, and personal care brands requiring metallic spot colors \u2014 in the same production week, with changeovers between client jobs completed in 15\u201325 minutes. This multi-client capability is the core value proposition for contract packagers and distributors who serve diverse client portfolios: one flexible machine replaces the fragmented infrastructure of multiple limited-capability workstations.<\/p>

Operational Excellence: Simplifying Your Daily Challenges<\/h2>

Intuitive Systems That Reduce Operator Training Time<\/h3>

User-friendly interfaces that cut onboarding from weeks to days<\/h4>

Modern automated tube printing presses incorporate touchscreen HMI (Human-Machine Interface \u2014 the operator control panel where production parameters, job recipes, and machine status are managed) with stored job recipes that recall all critical print parameters for a repeat job in under 5 minutes. An operator loading a repeat client order does not need to recalibrate from scratch; they select the stored recipe, confirm tube format, and initiate the production run.<\/p>

This recipe-recall capability reduces new operator onboarding time to productive operation from the 6\u201312 weeks required for manual press operation to\u00a02 \u00e0 4 semaines<\/strong>\u00a0for automated system operation \u2014 a training investment reduction that directly lowers the cost of turnover events.<\/p>

Fewer skilled technicians required, lower staffing costs<\/h4>

A manual 4-color tube printing operation producing 100,000 tubes per month typically requires 3\u20134 dedicated printing operators across shifts, plus quality control and maintenance coverage. The equivalent automated system requires 1\u20132 operators plus shared maintenance. At a blended labor cost of $18\u2013$25 per hour in most manufacturing markets, this staffing reduction represents\u00a0$40,000\u2013$72,000 in annual labor savings<\/strong>\u00a0on a single production line.<\/p>

Real-Time Monitoring and Control<\/h3>

Dashboard visibility into production metrics and quality data<\/h4>

Production dashboards on modern automated presses display OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness \u2014 the combined measure of production Availability \u00d7 Performance \u00d7 Quality; world-class benchmark: 85%) in real time, allowing production managers to identify efficiency losses as they occur rather than discovering them in end-of-shift reporting. A line running at 72% OEE that triggers a manager alert can have its constraint addressed during the shift \u2014 recovering lost output rather than logging it as a variance.<\/p>

For pharmaceutical operations, real-time parameter monitoring \u2014 UV cure intensity, print registration accuracy, corona treatment power level \u2014 generates the electronic batch record data that regulatory compliance requires, automatically and continuously, without manual data entry burden on operators.<\/p>

Early problem detection before defects reach customers<\/h4>

Inline camera vision inspection systems \u2014 standard on premium automated presses and available as add-on modules on mid-tier systems \u2014 inspect every tube as it exits the printing station, rejecting tubes with color density out of specification, text legibility failures, or registration errors before they enter the filling line.<\/p>

The financial value of catching defects at the printing stage versus at the filling stage (after the tube has been filled with product) is substantial: a defective empty tube costs $0.08\u2013$0.25; a defective filled and sealed tube costs $0.40\u2013$1.20 \u2014 plus the product inside. Inline inspection is not a quality luxury; it is cost-effective defect prevention.<\/p>

\"Automatic<\/a><\/p>

Seamless Integration With Your Existing Workflow<\/h3>

Compatibility with your current tube supply chain<\/h4>

Automated tube printing presses are designed to accept standard tube formats from all major tube manufacturers, handling PE, PP, ABL, PBL, and aluminum substrates from 16 mm to 60 mm in diameter without requiring custom tube modifications. Manufacturers who source blank tubes from established suppliers \u2014 standard practice in cosmetic and pharmaceutical tube production \u2014 can integrate an automated press directly into their existing supply chain with no upstream changes required.<\/p>

Minimal disruption during installation and transition<\/h4>

A structured parallel-operation transition \u2014 running the new automated press alongside existing manual equipment for 4\u20136 weeks during commissioning \u2014 allows production commitments to continue uninterrupted while the new system is validated and operators build proficiency. For pharmaceutical operations, this parallel period also supports the IQ\/OQ\/PQ (Installation Qualification \/ Operational Qualification \/ Performance Qualification \u2014 the three-stage equipment validation required for pharmaceutical manufacturing under GMP) validation runs required for pharmaceutical client qualification.<\/p>

Strengthening Your Market Position in a Competitive Industry<\/h2>

Faster Time-to-Market for New Products<\/h3>

Reduced lead times give you first-mover advantage<\/h4>

The difference between a 3-week and a 10-week tube printing lead time is a commercial decision point. A cosmetic brand that can respond to a trending ingredient with a printed, filled, and shelf-ready tube in 3 weeks captures the trend window. A brand whose printing lead time is 10 weeks misses it entirely.<\/p>

Modern automated tube printing infrastructure, with in-house production capability and rapid changeovers, is what makes the 3-week response possible. For distributors and agents, this time-to-market advantage is a powerful client retention argument: brands with the right tube printing infrastructure consistently outperform competitors in new product launch frequency and seasonal campaign execution.<\/p>

Building lasting customer loyalty through consistent quality<\/h4>

Consumer purchase behavior research in cosmetic packaging consistently identifies print quality as a primary driver of perceived product value and repeat purchase. A consumer who finds their premium face serum tube’s packaging color, print quality, and finish unchanged from the previous purchase confirms their quality assumption and reduces the probability of competitive switching. A consumer who notices visible inconsistency begins to question the formula inside \u2014 regardless of whether the formula changed at all.<\/p>

For pharmaceutical contract packagers, production reliability \u2014 defined as the ability to deliver committed quantities on committed dates with print quality that passes incoming inspection \u2014 is the primary differentiator in supplier selection. A supplier with documented print consistency, machine uptime data, and compliance records that pass audit scrutiny becomes difficult to displace even in competitive reprocurement cycles.<\/p>

Environmental and Compliance Benefits That Matter<\/h2>

Reducing Waste Aligns With Modern Consumer Values<\/h3>

Eco-friendly production that appeals to sustainability-conscious brands<\/h4>

Advanced registration systems on modern automated tube printing presses reduce scrap rates from the\u00a03\u20138% typical of manual operations<\/strong>\u00a0to\u00a0below 1%<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 a waste reduction that translates directly to fewer tubes manufactured and discarded without saleable value. For a brand marketing to environmentally conscious consumers, this scrap reduction is a legitimate sustainability metric that can be communicated with confidence.<\/p>

Modern automated presses also support\u00a0water-based and UV-curable ink systems<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 the environmentally preferred formulations under the EU’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) and US EPA VOC (Volatile Organic Compound \u2014 carbon-based chemicals that evaporate at room temperature and contribute to air quality issues; regulated under EPA and EU REACH frameworks) emission standards. Soy-based and water-based inks can reduce VOC emissions by up to\u00a080% compared to petroleum-based alternatives<\/strong>, offering cosmetic and pharmaceutical manufacturers a compliance pathway that also carries genuine sustainability credentials (sustainable packaging ink research<\/a>).<\/p>

Meeting Global Regulatory Standards With Confidence<\/h3>

Built-in compliance for international cosmetic and pharmaceutical requirements<\/h4>

For pharmaceutical tube printing under cGMP protocols, batch record documentation \u2014 the production record that captures every critical parameter for every batch \u2014 is a regulatory compliance requirement, not optional good practice. Modern automated presses with integrated data logging generate these records automatically during production: UV cure intensity at defined intervals, registration accuracy measurements, ink viscosity and temperature readings, operator identification, and production quantity counts. This electronic documentation is what pharmaceutical GMP auditors require and what manual documentation systems consistently fail to provide at the completeness and accuracy standard inspectors expect.<\/p>

Avoiding costly recalls through superior quality control<\/h4>

In pharmaceutical tube packaging, a single recall event triggered by print quality failure \u2014 illegible dosage information, a misplaced barcode, color coding that could cause patient confusion \u2014 costs $5,000\u2013$20,000+ in execution costs, $50,000\u2013$200,000 in regulatory response, and potentially millions in contract termination and reputational damage. The investment in automated tube printing equipment with 100% inline inspection is recall prevention insurance that the financial model for pharmaceutical packaging must include as a core calculation \u2014 not an optional premium.<\/p>

Making the Smart Investment Decision<\/h2>

Matching Equipment to Your Specific Production Profile<\/h3>

Assessing your production volume and growth trajectory<\/h4>

The correct framework for tube printing machine selection starts not with the machine specification but with a realistic production model: current monthly volume by tube format, projected 18-month peak volume based on the largest realistic new contract scenario, substrate mix across your current and planned product portfolio, and color complexity of your typical designs. These four inputs define the machine specification required \u2014 throughput range, substrate handling capability, color station count, and changeover performance requirements.<\/p>

For a manufacturer currently producing 40,000 tubes per month with a credible path to 150,000 monthly within 18 months, specifying a machine for 40,000 units is a planning failure that forces a second capital investment too soon. Specifying for 200,000 units may be equally problematic. The right specification \u2014 typically 150,000 units at full utilization \u2014 allows the growth to arrive without an equipment crisis and the capital deployed to be absorbed by the achieved volume.<\/p>

Dry offset vs. silk screen: choosing the right print technology<\/h4>

Dry offset printing<\/strong>\u00a0transfers ink indirectly via a rubber blanket onto the tube, delivering high-resolution multi-color graphics with excellent registration at 75\u2013300 tubes per minute. Preferred for photorealistic cosmetic branding, fine pharmaceutical regulatory text, and high-volume production.\u00a0Silk screen printing<\/strong>\u00a0pushes ink directly through a mesh stencil, producing thicker ink deposits with higher opacity \u2014 preferred for spot colors, metallic inks, white opaque backgrounds, and shorter runs where setup cost per job must be minimized.<\/p>

Most cosmetic brands running multiple SKUs with complex multi-color branding benefit from dry offset at scale. For specialty applications \u2014 bold opaque colors, metallic accents, or high-volume short-run production \u2014 silk screen printing offers operational advantages.\u00a0Miyoda Packaging Machinery’s brand and model comparison guide<\/a>\u00a0provides a structured evaluation framework for matching these technology profiles to your specific production requirements.<\/p>

Understanding Total Cost of Ownership \u2014 Not Just Purchase Price<\/h3>

The hidden expenses that determine your real equipment cost<\/h4>

The purchase price of a tube printing press represents typically\u00a025\u201340% of its 5-year total cost of ownership<\/strong>\u00a0at production volumes above 50,000 units per month. The remaining 60\u201375% is composed of operator labor, consumables (ink, screens, UV lamps, squeegee blades), maintenance (planned and reactive), downtime losses, quality costs (scrap, rework, customer returns), and compliance costs.<\/p>

Manufacturers who compare machines on purchase price alone consistently make the decision that produces the worst 5-year financial outcome. The correct comparison is a full 5-year TCO model populated with your actual wage rates, your real production volume, and realistic maintenance and downtime assumptions \u2014 not the vendor’s optimistic estimates.<\/p>

Partnering With the Right Supplier<\/h3>

What service and support level you should expect<\/h4>

A tube printing machine is a production dependency. When it stops, production stops. The after-sales service framework you secure at purchase determines whether a machine failure is a 2-hour inconvenience or a 3-week production crisis.<\/p>

Minimum acceptable service commitments include: a written spare parts SLA with lead times for the 10 most common wear components (UV lamps, squeegee blades, screens, bearings); remote diagnostic capability allowing a technician to access and diagnose the machine’s PLC (Programmable Logic Controller \u2014 the digital control brain that governs machine operation, stores job parameters, and generates production data) via secure network connection; and a regional service engineer within a defined maximum response time for on-site faults.<\/p>

Miyoda Packaging Machinery operates as a full-portfolio tube production equipment provider \u2014 covering printing, filling, sealing, and extrusion lines \u2014 which means technical support for an integrated line comes from one team with knowledge of how every component interacts, rather than multiple vendors each accountable only for their segment. For manufacturers building out complete tube production capabilities, this single-source integration eliminates the accountability gaps that multi-vendor lines create.<\/p>

Training, maintenance, and technical assistance that protects your investment<\/h4>

Request written confirmation of what training is included at installation \u2014 and what is available post-installation as the team expands or turnover occurs. Premium equipment suppliers provide structured operator training (typically 3\u20135 days on-site at commissioning), maintenance team training (scheduled interval-based procedures, calibration protocols, fault diagnosis), and access to technical documentation that empowers in-house resolution of the most common fault scenarios.<\/p>

Suppliers who provide only a brief installation visit and a phone number for support have told you exactly how they intend to support your production when it matters most.<\/p>

\"Pharmaceutical-grade<\/p>

Your Path Forward: From Production Frustration to Manufacturing Excellence<\/h2>

The cosmetic and pharmaceutical tube packaging manufacturers winning today are not doing it by waiting. They have invested in modern tube printing machinery \u2014 and they are producing the results that decision generates: lower cost per tube, higher print quality, faster market response, and client relationships built on documented reliability.<\/p>

The gap between struggling manufacturers and market leaders in this industry is increasingly an equipment gap. The formulas are similar. The talent pools are comparably constrained. The market opportunities are available to all. What differs is the production infrastructure \u2014 and modern tube printing machinery is the infrastructure that makes the difference executable.<\/p>

Every month you continue with manual or outdated tube printing equipment is a month your competitors are reducing their per-unit cost, improving their print consistency, and expanding their client capacity. The compounding nature of operational efficiency means the advantage grows with time \u2014 not linearly, but exponentially, as clients who experience the difference consolidate volume with suppliers they trust.<\/p>

The calculation is not complex. The path is not unclear. The question is:\u00a0when?<\/em><\/p>

Ready to Transform Your Tube Production?<\/h2>

Get a personalized assessment of your production requirements and discover exactly how modern tube printing machinery can solve your specific challenges \u2014 with real ROI projections and a TCO analysis tailored to your volume, substrate mix, and product lineup.<\/p>

Explore Miyoda Tube Production Machinery \u2192<\/a><\/strong><\/p>

WhatsApp Direct Line:\u00a0+86 137 7421 4471<\/a><\/strong><\/p>

Glossaire des termes cl\u00e9s<\/h2>
Term<\/th>Definition<\/th>Practical Example<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
\u0394E (Delta-E)<\/strong><\/td>A numerical measure of color difference. \u0394E < 1.0 is imperceptible; \u0394E > 3.0 fails most premium cosmetic brand standards.<\/td>A “Pantone 485 Red” tube measuring \u0394E 3.8 against the approved standard will be rejected at retailer incoming inspection.<\/td><\/tr>
Registration Accuracy<\/strong><\/td>Precision with which successive color layers align on a printed tube, measured in mm. Lower = better.<\/td>Premium machines hold \u00b10.2\u20130.5 mm; budget equipment drifts to 2\u20133 mm after 6 weeks of production.<\/td><\/tr>
TCO (co\u00fbt total de possession)<\/strong><\/td>Complete financial cost of owning and operating equipment over its useful life \u2014 purchase price, labor, consumables, maintenance, downtime, and replacement.<\/td>A $15,000 machine with $93,000 in annual downtime losses carries higher TCO than a $50,000 machine with $5,000 in annual downtime.<\/td><\/tr>
OEE (efficacit\u00e9 globale des \u00e9quipements)<\/strong><\/td>Availability \u00d7 Performance \u00d7 Quality. World-class benchmark: 85%.<\/td>A press at 65% OEE on a 1,000-tube\/hour line delivers 650 effective tubes\/hour \u2014 a 35% productivity gap.<\/td><\/tr>
Dry Offset Printing<\/strong><\/td>Ink transferred indirectly via a rubber blanket onto the tube. Delivers sharp multi-color graphics at 75\u2013300 tubes\/min.<\/td>Preferred for photorealistic cosmetic tube branding and fine pharmaceutical regulatory text.<\/td><\/tr>
Silk Screen Printing<\/strong><\/td>Ink pushed through a mesh stencil directly onto the tube. Higher opacity, ideal for metallic spot colors.<\/td>Preferred for opaque white backgrounds, gold metallic accents, and specialty ink effects.<\/td><\/tr>
UV Curing<\/strong><\/td>UV light instantly hardens ink, enabling production speeds of 80\u2013160 tubes\/min.<\/td>UV lamp intensity must be monitored \u2014 degradation below threshold produces adhesion failures detectable only in accelerated aging tests.<\/td><\/tr>
LDPE<\/strong><\/td>Low-Density Polyethylene \u2014 the most common substrate for cosmetic soft tubes. Requires corona pre-treatment for optimal ink adhesion.<\/td>Standard substrate for body lotion, facial cream, and sunscreen tubes globally.<\/td><\/tr>
ABL (stratifi\u00e9 \u00e0 barri\u00e8re d'aluminium)<\/strong><\/td>Multi-layer tube with aluminum foil core. Used in pharmaceutical and premium cosmetic packaging requiring barrier protection.<\/td>Standard in pharmaceutical ointment tubes, toothpaste, and high-end cosmetic serums.<\/td><\/tr>
IQ\/OQ\/PQ<\/strong><\/td>Installation, Operational, and Performance Qualification \u2014 three-stage validation required for pharmaceutical manufacturing equipment under GMP.<\/td>A contract packer reduces pharma client qualification time from 6 months to 8 weeks by providing a pre-assembled IQ\/OQ documentation package.<\/td><\/tr>
cGMP<\/strong><\/td>Current Good Manufacturing Practice \u2014 FDA minimum quality standards for pharmaceutical manufacturing and packaging.<\/td>All critical print parameters (ink batch, cure intensity, registration) must be documented per batch under cGMP.<\/td><\/tr>
IHM<\/strong><\/td>Human-Machine Interface \u2014 the operator control panel where job parameters, production status, and alarms are managed.<\/td>A touchscreen HMI with stored job recipes enables changeover from one SKU to another in under 20 minutes.<\/td><\/tr>
PLC<\/strong><\/td>Programmable Logic Controller \u2014 the machine’s digital control brain. Governs operation, stores recipes, and generates production data.<\/td>Modern PLCs support OPC-UA protocol for MES\/ERP data integration without custom middleware.<\/td><\/tr>
Corona Treatment<\/strong><\/td>Electrical pre-treatment raising tube surface energy to improve ink adhesion on LDPE\/PP substrates.<\/td>Treatment effectiveness decays within 24\u201372 hours \u2014 production-interlocked monitoring prevents adhesion failures from delayed processing.<\/td><\/tr>
VOC<\/strong><\/td>Volatile Organic Compound \u2014 carbon-based chemicals that evaporate at room temperature, found in solvent-based inks. Subject to regulatory limits under EU REACH and US EPA frameworks.<\/td>European manufacturers switching from solvent to UV-curable inks reduce VOC emissions by up to 80% and simplify compliance.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>

Questions fr\u00e9quemment pos\u00e9es<\/h2>

Q1. How much production capacity do I actually gain by switching to automated tube printing machinery?<\/strong><\/p>

Most manufacturers see a\u00a03\u20135\u00d7 increase in output<\/strong>\u00a0depending on their current process. A manual operation producing 700 tubes per hour per operator typically reaches 3,000\u20134,500 tubes per hour on a mid-tier automated system with a single operator managing the line. The gain is not just in raw throughput \u2014 automated systems maintain their throughput rate across a full shift, while manual rates decline as operator fatigue accumulates. At 150,000 tubes monthly, the shift to automation typically adds the equivalent of 3\u20134 FTE production operators’ capacity without increasing headcount.<\/p>

Q2. What is the realistic payback period for a tube printing machine investment?<\/strong><\/p>

Payback typically falls in the\u00a018\u201330 month range<\/strong>\u00a0for manufacturers at 50,000\u2013200,000 tubes monthly, driven by combined labor savings, waste reduction, and downtime recovery. High-volume manufacturers at 200,000+ monthly often achieve payback within 12\u201318 months. Small-volume manufacturers under 30,000 monthly may see 30\u201336 month timelines, but should factor in non-financial value: the ability to accept new client orders that manual equipment cannot fulfill economically, and the quality consistency that enables premium pricing and client retention.<\/p>

Q3. Can tube printing machinery handle all the different tube sizes and materials we use?<\/strong><\/p>

Modern automated tube printing presses handle\u00a0tube diameters from 16 mm to 60 mm<\/strong>\u00a0across PE, PP, ABL, PBL, and aluminum substrates \u2014 the complete range used in cosmetic and pharmaceutical soft tube production. Substrate flexibility requires confirmation of corona pre-treatment integration for low-energy PE substrates and UV cure system validation for ABL and aluminum formats. Always request a substrate compatibility matrix and verify with sample print trials on your actual tube materials \u2014 not supplier demo tubes.<\/p>

Q4. How much training do operators need before they can run the equipment independently?<\/strong><\/p>

Most operators reach productive independent operation on modern automated presses within\u00a02 \u00e0 4 semaines<\/strong>\u00a0for normal production runs, and 4\u20138 weeks for full competence including fault diagnosis, recipe management, and quality verification. This compares to 8\u201312 weeks for manual press proficiency, because automated systems guide operators through consistent procedures and generate alerts when parameters drift rather than relying on operator perception. Structured training programs from the equipment manufacturer \u2014 covering startup, changeover, routine maintenance, and basic fault response \u2014 accelerate this timeline significantly.<\/p>

Q5. We need to print limited-edition and seasonal products quickly. How do modern machines support that?<\/strong><\/p>

Modern automated tube printing machinery with servo-indexed mandrel systems and digital color-preset recall completes job changeovers in\u00a015\u201325 minutes<\/strong>\u00a0for repeat jobs. First-time jobs require registration setup and test runs \u2014 typically 45\u201390 minutes. This changeover performance makes short-run limited editions of 1,500\u20135,000 tubes economically viable where they were prohibitively expensive on manual presses with 2\u20134 hour setup requirements. For seasonal campaign production, the ability to execute 3\u20134 SKU changeovers per shift enables complete seasonal collections to be produced within a single production week.<\/p>

Q6. How does tube printing machinery ensure we meet pharmaceutical and cosmetic regulatory requirements?<\/strong><\/p>

Modern automated presses include precision registration (\u00b10.2\u20130.5 mm) ensuring regulatory text elements stay within required label positions, UV cure monitoring ensuring ink adhesion durability across shelf life, and integrated data logging generating batch records documenting all critical print parameters per production run. For FDA 21 CFR compliance, the machine must support electronic batch records under 21 CFR Part 11 requirements \u2014 verify this capability explicitly with any prospective supplier. For EU GMP, batch record documentation per\u00a0cGMP Chapter 5<\/a>\u00a0must be audit-ready at all times.<\/p>

Q7. What maintenance and support should we expect after purchasing equipment?<\/strong><\/p>

Minimum acceptable post-purchase support includes: written spare parts SLA with committed lead times for common wear components; remote diagnostic access to the machine’s PLC for software-level fault resolution without a site visit; structured on-site training at commissioning for operators and maintenance staff; access to technical documentation (maintenance schedules, calibration procedures, troubleshooting guides); and a defined service engineer response time for on-site faults. Request all of these commitments in writing before purchase \u2014 they are as important as the machine specification itself.<\/p>

Q8. How much waste reduction can we realistically expect from automated tube printing?<\/strong><\/p>

Advanced registration and inline quality control systems reduce scrap from\u00a03\u20138% on manual lines to below 1%<\/strong>\u00a0on automated equipment. On a 100,000-tube monthly run with a blended material and labor cost of $0.28\/tube, moving from 6% to 0.8% defect rates saves approximately\u00a0$1,456\/month ($17,472\/year)<\/strong>\u00a0in direct waste cost. For pharmaceutical production where defective batches carry additional investigation and documentation costs, the waste reduction value is substantially higher.<\/p>

Q9. What is the difference between tube offset printing and silk screen printing, and how do we choose?<\/strong><\/p>

Dry offset printing transfers ink via a rubber blanket for high-resolution multi-color graphics \u2014 preferred for photorealistic designs, fine text, and continuous-tone gradients at speeds of 75\u2013300 tubes per minute. Silk screen printing pushes ink directly through a mesh stencil for higher ink deposit thickness \u2014 preferred for opaque spot colors, metallic inks, white backgrounds, and shorter runs. For most cosmetic brands running multiple SKUs with complex multi-color branding, dry offset delivers superior visual results at production scale. For specialty applications, silk screen printing offers operational advantages. Both machine types are available from\u00a0Miyoda Packaging Machinery’s multi-decoration machine range<\/a>\u00a0for operations where both applications are required.<\/p>

Q10. Can the same machine be used for both cosmetic and pharmaceutical tube printing?<\/strong><\/p>

Yes \u2014 with appropriate procedural controls. Many tube printing presses are mechanically capable of handling both applications. The distinction lies in process validation and documentation. Pharmaceutical applications require GMP-compliant ink qualification, IQ\/OQ\/PQ documentation, and potentially a supplier audit from your pharmaceutical client. If you plan to run both cosmetic and pharmaceutical products on the same press, you need: a validated cleaning validation protocol between product types, a separate ink log for qualified pharmaceutical inks, and operator training records meeting GMP standards. Confirm with any prospective machine supplier whether they can provide the necessary documentation package for pharmaceutical-use validation.<\/p>

Q11. How do we evaluate total cost of ownership across different machine options before purchase?<\/strong><\/p>

Build a 5-year TCO model including: equipment cost and financing charges, labor at your actual local wage rates, materials consumption based on your real production volume and design complexity, planned and unplanned maintenance costs, and quality costs including expected reprint and scrap rates for each machine type. Include a realistic worst-case downtime scenario for each option. This consistently reveals that the lowest-purchase-price option is rarely the lowest-TCO option beyond Year 2. For a structured framework tailored to your specific situation, the team at\u00a0Miyoda Packaging Machinery<\/a>\u00a0propose des conseils sur le co\u00fbt total de possession (TCO) dans le cadre du processus d'\u00e9valuation des \u00e9quipements.<\/p>

Q12. What is the minimum monthly tube volume that justifies investment in automated tube printing?<\/strong><\/p>

As a general benchmark, brands consistently producing more than\u00a08,000\u201312,000 printed tubes per month<\/strong>\u00a0across 3 or more SKUs typically find in-house automated printing economically justified within 18\u201330 months. Below that threshold, contract printing often remains more cost-efficient when accounting for machine depreciation, consumables, and operator labor. However, pure cost calculation misses strategic value: in-house printing provides design iteration speed (24\u201348 hours vs. 4\u20136 weeks for external turnaround), packaging confidentiality, and direct quality control \u2014 factors that can justify in-house investment even below the pure cost break-even threshold for brands where speed-to-market or IP protection is a business priority.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The global tube packaging market was valued at\u00a0USD 13.4 billion in 2025\u00a0and is projected to reach\u00a0USD 21.9 billion by 2033, growing at a CAGR of approximately 5.6% (Grand View Research). Inside that growth sits a brutal competitive reality: shelf space is finite, retail buyers are exacting, and the consumer purchasing decision happens in under four […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5369,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"Tube Printing Machinery: Key Advantages for Your Brand","_seopress_titles_desc":"Discover how tube printing machinery cuts costs, boosts quality, and gives cosmetic & pharma brands the competitive edge to grow faster.","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[64,65,59],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-company-news","category-tube-packaging-industry-trends-market-insights","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5368\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5369"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}