{"id":5422,"date":"2026-08-24T01:04:37","date_gmt":"2026-08-24T01:04:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/?p=5422"},"modified":"2026-08-20T05:10:34","modified_gmt":"2026-08-20T05:10:34","slug":"benefits-high-quality-filling-liquid-machine-cosmetic-pharmaceutical","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/benefits-high-quality-filling-liquid-machine-cosmetic-pharmaceutical\/","title":{"rendered":"Les avantages d'investir dans une machine de remplissage de liquides de haute qualit\u00e9"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"5422\" class=\"elementor elementor-5422\" data-elementor-post-type=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-b8f532c e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"b8f532c\" data-element_type=\"container\" data-e-type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-2b118f1 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"2b118f1\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div id=\"container\" class=\"split-container\"><div id=\"preview\" class=\"column preview-pane\"><div id=\"preview-wrapper\"><div id=\"output\" class=\"content markdown-body\"><h2>The Benefits of Investing in a High-Quality Filling Liquid Machine<\/h2><p>The tube packaging market is growing fast \u2014 valued at\u00a0<strong>USD 13.43 billion in 2025<\/strong>\u00a0and projected to reach\u00a0<strong>USD 21.9 billion by 2033<\/strong>\u00a0at a CAGR of 6.2% (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.grandviewresearch.com\/industry-analysis\/tube-packaging-market\">Grand View Research<\/a>). For cosmetic and pharmaceutical tube producers, that growth is both an opportunity and a pressure test. Orders are rising. Regulatory scrutiny is tightening. And somewhere in the middle, production lines are expected to deliver flawless output, every shift.<\/p><p>Yet walk into most mid-tier production facilities and you will find the same hidden drains: tubes that consistently run 2\u20133 grams over target weight, sealing jaws that drift out of temperature alignment, and batch record systems held together by spreadsheets and memory. These are not equipment problems alone \u2014 they are the compounding result of under-investing in the machine at the center of the operation.<\/p><p>A high-quality\u00a0<strong>machine de remplissage de liquides<\/strong>\u00a0(also called a tube filling and sealing machine \u2014 equipment that dispenses a measured volume of product into a tube, seals the tail, and codes the batch, all in a continuous automated cycle) is not simply a faster version of manual or semi-automatic filling. It is an engineered system that changes the economics of your entire production line. This guide breaks down the real operational advantages \u2014 with data, production scenarios, and honest trade-offs \u2014 so you can make a capital decision based on what actually matters to your business.<\/p><hr \/><p><a title=\"toothpaste tube orienting machine-Miyoda Machine\" href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/204745097@N06\/55475588258\/in\/dateposted-public\/\" data-flickr-embed=\"true\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/live.staticflickr.com\/65535\/55475588258_d350869def_b.jpg\" alt=\"toothpaste tube orienting machine-Miyoda Machine\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" \/><\/a><\/p><p><em>A fully automatic tube filling machine in operation \u2014 servo-driven piston dosing, hot-air sealing jaw, and integrated batch coding running at 80+ tubes per minute. Source: Miyoda Packaging Machinery<\/em><\/p><hr \/><h2>1. Maximized Production Efficiency and Throughput<\/h2><h3>Why Output Speed Is a Revenue Lever, Not Just a Specification<\/h3><p>A trained operator on a mid-range semi-automatic filler sustains\u00a0<strong>25\u201330 tubes per minute<\/strong>\u00a0in real production \u2014 roughly 12,000 tubes per 8-hour shift. A single-head fully automatic machine running at 80 tubes per minute (TPM) at 90% OEE delivers\u00a0<strong>38,400 tubes per shift<\/strong>. A dual-head system at 120 TPM reaches\u00a0<strong>57,600 per shift<\/strong>.<\/p><p>That difference \u2014 approximately 26,000 additional tubes per shift \u2014 is not a minor efficiency gain. At a retail value of USD 3.50 per cosmetic tube, the automatic line&#8217;s incremental daily output represents roughly\u00a0<strong>USD 91,000 in additional production capacity per shift<\/strong>, before margin is applied.<\/p><blockquote><p><strong>Glossary \u2014 OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness):<\/strong>\u00a0OEE = Availability \u00d7 Performance Rate \u00d7 Quality Rate. World-class tube filling lines achieve OEE of 85\u201392%. Fully automatic lines typically run at 85\u201390%; semi-automatic lines at 70\u201380%. Always size machine capacity to OEE-adjusted output, not the nameplate speed listed in supplier brochures.<\/p><\/blockquote><h3>Intelligent Automation Protects Uptime<\/h3><p>Modern high-quality filling machines incorporate servo-driven indexing, PLC-controlled alarm monitoring, and predictive maintenance data outputs via OPC-UA protocols. These features protect production continuity in measurable ways. A cosmetic manufacturer in Germany documented\u00a0<strong>USD 28,000 in rush-order surcharges<\/strong>\u00a0in a single quarter because their semi-automatic line was running at full capacity with no output buffer during a peak retail period. Adding 25\u201330% production headroom through a correctly specified automatic machine is margin protection, not over-engineering.<\/p><p><strong>Real production speed benchmarks across machine types:<\/strong><\/p><table><thead><tr><th>Type de machine<\/th><th>Sustained Real TPM<\/th><th>Tubes per 8-hr Shift<\/th><th>Ideal Annual Volume<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Semi-Automatic (entry)<\/td><td>10\u201320<\/td><td>4,800\u20139,600<\/td><td>&lt;2M\/year<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Semi-Automatic (mid-range)<\/td><td>20\u201340<\/td><td>9,600\u201319,200<\/td><td>2\u20135M\/year<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Automatic (single-head)<\/td><td>60\u2013100<\/td><td>28,800\u201348,000<\/td><td>5\u201315M\/year<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Automatic (dual-head)<\/td><td>100\u2013150<\/td><td>48,000\u201372,000<\/td><td>15\u201330M\/year<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Automatic (high-speed)<\/td><td>150\u2013200+<\/td><td>72,000\u201396,000+<\/td><td>&gt;30M\/year<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><h3>24\/7 Operation Without Proportional Labor Increase<\/h3><p>High-volume automatic filling lines are engineered for multi-shift, continuous operation. A single technician can monitor multiple lines simultaneously \u2014 something structurally impossible with semi-automatic equipment that requires one operator per machine per shift. For producers running 3-shift, 6-day schedules, the labor model of a fully automatic line removes the most volatile variable in per-unit cost: operator headcount.<\/p><hr \/><h2>2. Unmatched Filling Accuracy and Consistency<\/h2><h3>The Real Cost of Fill Weight Drift<\/h3><p>Filling accuracy is where the financial case for high-quality equipment becomes impossible to ignore. Consider a manufacturer filling 100 g cosmetic cream tubes at a typical semi-automatic accuracy of \u00b12\u20133%. At a product cost of USD 18\/kg and 10 million tubes per year, a systematic 3 g overfill gives away:<\/p><p>$$\\text{Annual Product Giveaway Cost} = 10{,}000{,}000 \\times 0.003 , \\text{kg} \\times $18\/\\text{kg} = $540{,}000$$<\/p><p>A precision servo-driven filling machine achieves\u00a0<strong>\u00b10.3\u20130.5% fill weight accuracy<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 tightening that overfill to 0.3\u20130.5 g and reducing annual giveaway cost to approximately\u00a0<strong>USD 54,000\u201390,000<\/strong>. The difference \u2014 USD 450,000 to USD 486,000 per year \u2014 represents recovered margin from a single specification upgrade.<\/p><blockquote><p><strong>Glossary \u2014 Cpk (Process Capability Index):<\/strong>\u00a0Cpk measures how consistently your fill weight stays within specification limits relative to natural process variation. A Cpk of 1.0 means 0.27% of fills fall outside specification. A Cpk of 1.67 reduces that to 0.006%. Pharmaceutical buyers typically require Cpk \u2265 1.33. High-quality automatic filling machines routinely achieve Cpk of\u00a0<strong>1.5\u20132.0<\/strong>; semi-automatic lines typically produce Cpk of\u00a0<strong>0.9\u20131.2<\/strong>.<\/p><\/blockquote><h3>Underfilling: A Compliance and Brand Problem<\/h3><p>Underfilling carries its own costs. In the EU, pharmaceutical tube products must meet fill volume accuracy within 3% of declared volume. Major cosmetic retailers \u2014 including several European pharmacy chains \u2014 require supplier Cpk data as part of qualification audits. Tubes consistently reading below declared weight fail retailer checks and expose the manufacturer to formal audit findings, corrective action requirements, and ultimately contract termination.<\/p><p>For luxury cosmetic brands where a 50 ml face serum retails at USD 120+, a consistently light fill is not just a compliance risk \u2014 it erodes the consumer trust that supports premium pricing.<\/p><hr \/><p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/servo-dosing-pump-tube-filling-machine-pharmaceutical.jpg\" alt=\"Precision dosing pump and nozzle assembly on a pharmaceutical-grade tube filling machine with servo-controlled fill head\" \/>\u00a0<em>Servo-driven piston dosing head with electronic fill weight monitoring \u2014 the technology behind \u00b10.3\u20130.5% fill accuracy on modern automatic tube filling lines. Source: Miyoda Packaging Machinery<\/em><\/p><hr \/><h2>3. Reduced Product Waste and Operational Costs<\/h2><h3>Where Waste Is Actually Being Generated<\/h3><p>Most production managers track finished-product waste at end-of-line inspection. The more expensive waste happens upstream: product trapped in dead-leg nozzle assemblies during changeover, product spillage from imprecise cut-off, and material lost to fill-head purging during startup sequences.<\/p><p>Advanced filling machines address each of these through engineering design:<\/p><ul><li><strong>Drip-free anti-drip nozzles<\/strong>\u00a0with precision cut-off eliminate post-fill nozzle drip \u2014 a seemingly minor issue that on a 200 g tube at 80 TPM accumulates to approximately 4.8 kg of wasted product per 8-hour shift.<\/li><li><strong>Closed-loop fill head architecture<\/strong>\u00a0minimizes product exposure between fills, reducing oxidation-related product loss in sensitive formulations.<\/li><li><strong>Automated CIP (Clean-in-Place) circuits<\/strong>\u00a0reduce changeover purge waste by 50\u201370% compared to manual disassembly cleaning \u2014 while simultaneously shortening changeover time.<\/li><\/ul><blockquote><p><strong>Glossary \u2014 CIP (Clean-in-Place):<\/strong>\u00a0An automated chemical flushing system that cleans product-contact surfaces without disassembling the machine. Reduces cleaning time from 2\u20133 hours (manual teardown) to 30\u201345 minutes of documented automated cycling \u2014 and eliminates cross-contamination risk between product runs.<\/p><\/blockquote><h3>Comparing Waste Rates: Manual vs. Automated Systems<\/h3><table><thead><tr><th>Filling Method<\/th><th>Pr\u00e9cision de remplissage<\/th><th>Waste Rate<\/th><th>Drip\/Leak Incidents<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Manual \/ Semi-Automatic<\/td><td>\u00b12%\u20135%<\/td><td>2%\u20135% of output<\/td><td>Frequent<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>High-Quality Automatic<\/td><td>\u00b10.3%\u20130.5%<\/td><td>0.3%\u20131% of output<\/td><td>Minimal (anti-drip systems)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><p>Source:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lienm.com\/blogs\/reduce-waste-with-filling-machines\/\">LIENM Filling Machine Waste Reduction Data<\/a><\/p><p>At 10 million tubes per year, reducing waste rate from 3% to 0.5% recovers 250,000 units of output \u2014 the equivalent of adding 6\u20137 production days per year without running a single additional shift.<\/p><h3>Lower Long-Term Operating Costs Despite Higher Initial Investment<\/h3><p>A USD 25,000 semi-automatic machine producing 2 million tubes per year with USD 45,000 in annual operating costs yields a 10-year TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) of approximately\u00a0<strong>USD 475,000<\/strong>, at a per-unit cost of\u00a0<strong>USD 0.024<\/strong>. A USD 80,000 automatic machine producing 8 million tubes per year with USD 38,000 in annual operating costs yields a 10-year TCO of approximately\u00a0<strong>USD 460,000<\/strong>, at a per-unit cost of\u00a0<strong>USD 0.006<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 75% lower per unit despite the higher purchase price.<\/p><hr \/><h2>4. Enhanced Product Quality and Brand Integrity<\/h2><h3>Consistency Is the Product<\/h3><p>In cosmetics, the experience of using the product begins when the consumer picks up the tube. A tube that fills inconsistently \u2014 sometimes full, sometimes not \u2014 creates visible variation in tube hardness and feel. A seam that is slightly misaligned or incompletely fused is not just aesthetically substandard; it is a quality signal that communicates manufacturing carelessness regardless of what is inside.<\/p><p>High-quality filling machines eliminate these variations through system engineering. Servo-driven fill heads maintain the same piston stroke \u00b10.1 mm across 500,000 consecutive fills. Hot-air sealing stations hold jaw temperature within \u00b12\u00b0C of setpoint \u2014 compared to \u00b110\u201315\u00b0C drift common on older semi-automatic units \u2014 producing seals with consistent appearance, width, and structural integrity.<\/p><h3>Air Entrapment, Oxidation, and Contamination Prevention<\/h3><p>For sensitive cosmetic and pharmaceutical formulations, the filling process itself is a contamination risk. Products containing vitamin C, retinol, or peptides can oxidize during filling if air is incorporated into the product stream during nozzle changes or startup sequences.<\/p><p>High-quality machines address this through:<\/p><ul><li><strong>Bottom-up nozzle filling<\/strong>\u00a0that displaces air from the tube before product contact begins<\/li><li><strong>Nitrogen blanketing options<\/strong>\u00a0that purge the fill zone with inert gas for oxygen-sensitive formulations<\/li><li><strong>316L stainless steel product-contact surfaces<\/strong>\u00a0with electropolished Ra \u2264 0.8 \u03bcm finish that eliminates bacterial harborage points<\/li><\/ul><p>A South Korean skincare brand documented a\u00a0<strong>40% reduction in oxidative degradation complaints<\/strong>\u00a0after switching from standard semi-automatic filling to a closed-system automatic line with nitrogen blanketing on their vitamin C serum production.<\/p><h3>Premium Positioning Requires Consistent Execution<\/h3><p>Luxury cosmetic buyers \u2014 and pharmaceutical distributors \u2014 perform incoming quality audits on tube fill weight, seal integrity, and visual appearance. A single shipment with visible seal variation or fill weight variance outside specification can trigger a formal Corrective Action and Preventive Action (CAPA) request. Three CAPA events within a rolling audit period can result in delisting from the supplier panel. The cost of that delisting far exceeds any savings from running lower-quality equipment.<\/p><hr \/><h2>5. Regulatory Compliance and Traceability<\/h2><h3>Compliance Is Not a Feature \u2014 It Is the Foundation<\/h3><p>For pharmaceutical tube filling,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/drugs\/pharmaceutical-quality-resources\/current-good-manufacturing-practice-cgmp-regulations\">FDA 21 CFR, partie 211<\/a>\u00a0mandates that equipment must be constructed from materials that do not contaminate product, have documented cleaning SOPs, and generate batch records for every production run. Non-compliance results in Warning Letters, product seizure, and facility shutdown \u2014 consequences that have materialized for manufacturers who failed to document GMP compliance during expansion into pharmaceutical contracts.<\/p><p>For cosmetic brands selling in the EU,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.iso.org\/standard\/36437.html\">ISO 22716:2007<\/a>\u00a0requires equipment qualification documentation and documented production records \u2014 requirements increasingly audited by major retail buyers as part of their supplier qualification programs, not just regulatory bodies.<\/p><h3>IQ\/OQ\/PQ Validation: What It Means and What It Costs<\/h3><blockquote><p><strong>Glossary \u2014 IQ\/OQ\/PQ:<\/strong><\/p><ul><li><strong>IQ (Installation Qualification):<\/strong>\u00a0Documents that the machine was installed per design specifications with correct utilities.<\/li><li><strong>OQ (Operational Qualification):<\/strong>\u00a0Verifies the machine performs within specification at minimum, target, and maximum operating settings.<\/li><li><strong>PQ (Performance Qualification):<\/strong>\u00a0Demonstrates consistent production of compliant product across three consecutive batches at production conditions.<\/li><\/ul><\/blockquote><p>A realistic IQ\/OQ\/PQ timeline for pharmaceutical equipment qualification runs\u00a0<strong>8\u201316 weeks<\/strong>\u00a0from machine delivery, with total costs of\u00a0<strong>USD 20,000\u2013100,000<\/strong>\u00a0depending on equipment complexity. Suppliers who provide IQ\/OQ\/PQ template protocols as standard scope \u2014 not as a paid add-on \u2014 signal genuine experience in regulated market supply. This is a supplier selection criterion.<\/p><p>A contract pharmaceutical manufacturer in Brazil learned this the hard way: their domestically purchased filling machine had been running correctly for four years, but when a European distributor requested the machine qualification file before approving a supply contract, it did not exist. Remediation took\u00a0<strong>seven months and approximately USD 38,000<\/strong>\u00a0in consulting work before the first EU-bound shipment cleared.<\/p><h3>Electronic Batch Records and Audit-Ready Documentation<\/h3><p>Modern pharmaceutical-grade filling machines generate electronic batch records automatically \u2014 linking each production run to machine settings, fill weights, sealing temperatures, operator IDs, and raw material lots. Pharmaceutical regulations require minimum\u00a0<strong>5-year data retention<\/strong>. For cosmetic producers supplying major retail chains, providing batch traceability on request has become a standard supplier qualification expectation.<\/p><p>Suppliers offering machines with\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/regulatory-information\/search-fda-guidance-documents\/part-11-electronic-records-electronic-signatures-scope-and-application\">21 CFR Part 11<\/a>-compliant electronic records eliminate the manual data entry bottleneck that creates errors, slows audits, and exposes manufacturers to compliance findings.<\/p><hr \/><h2>6. Flexibility Across Product Lines and Tube Formats<\/h2><h3>One Machine, Many Products \u2014 If Specified Correctly<\/h3><p>A production line that cannot adapt to changing product portfolios is a liability, not an asset. The cosmetic industry&#8217;s new-product velocity has increased dramatically: boutique brands launch 15\u201330 new SKUs per year; contract manufacturers serve dozens of clients simultaneously with different tube formats, fill volumes, and materials.<\/p><p>High-quality filling machines designed for format flexibility can handle:<\/p><ul><li><strong>Tube diameters from 13\u201360 mm<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 covering pencil-tip applicators through large body lotion tubes<\/li><li><strong>Tube materials:<\/strong>\u00a0LDPE\/HDPE plastic, ABL (Aluminum Barrier Laminate), PBL (Plastic Barrier Laminate), and all-aluminum crimp-seal tubes<\/li><li><strong>Fill volumes from 5 ml to 400 ml<\/strong>\u00a0within the same machine platform<\/li><li><strong>Product viscosities from 5 cP (serums, toners) to 500,000+ cP (thick ointments)<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 managed through pump type selection and fill pressure settings<\/li><\/ul><blockquote><p><strong>Glossary \u2014 Viscosity:<\/strong>\u00a0A measure of a fluid&#8217;s resistance to flow. Water is approximately 1 cP. Toothpaste runs 100,000\u2013200,000 cP at rest, dropping to 20,000\u201340,000 cP under shear stress during filling. The pump type (piston, gear, rotary lobe) must be matched to product viscosity at fill temperature.<\/p><\/blockquote><h3>Quick Changeover: The Metric That Determines Real Flexibility<\/h3><p>Nominal machine flexibility is only valuable if changeover is fast enough to make it practical. On an older semi-automatic machine, switching between a 30 mm and a 40 mm diameter tube can require\u00a0<strong>45\u201370 minutes<\/strong>\u00a0of manual adjustment. On a servo-driven machine with stored HMI recipe parameters and color-coded quick-release tooling, the same diameter change completes in\u00a0<strong>25\u201345 minutes<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 and a fill volume adjustment on the same tube takes less than\u00a0<strong>2 minutes via touchscreen recipe recall<\/strong>.<\/p><p>A European contract cosmetics manufacturer running 24 cream and gel SKUs weekly reported that installing a servo-driven machine with digital recipe management reduced total weekly changeover time from\u00a0<strong>6.2 hours to 1.8 hours<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 recovering 228 additional production hours per year without adding headcount.<\/p><table><thead><tr><th>Changeover Type<\/th><th>Semi-automatique<\/th><th>High-Quality Automatic<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Fill volume only (same tube)<\/td><td>5\u201310 min<\/td><td>1\u20132 min (HMI recipe recall)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Tube length change (same diameter)<\/td><td>10\u201320 min<\/td><td>10\u201320 min<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Tube diameter change<\/td><td>45\u201370 min<\/td><td>25\u201345 min (quick-release tooling)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Full format + product change<\/td><td>60\u201390 min<\/td><td>45\u201375 min (with auto CIP)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><hr \/><p>{% youtube Dh-hpAiL1S0 %}<\/p><p><em>Watch: High-Speed Automatic 2-Head Tube Filling &amp; Sealing Machine \u2014 observe the continuous rotary cycle, servo-driven indexing, automatic tube orientation, hot-air sealing station, and batch code embossing running at production speed. This demonstrates the throughput and consistency levels that cosmetic and pharmaceutical brands depend on at 5M+ annual volume.<\/em><\/p><hr \/><h2>7. Durability and Lower Total Cost of Ownership<\/h2><h3>Why the Purchase Price Is Only 30\u201340% of the Story<\/h3><p>The single most reliable path to the worst financial outcome in tube filling equipment is optimizing for purchase price. A USD 12,000 entry-level semi-automatic filler with a 3-month spare parts lead time from the manufacturer is not a USD 12,000 machine. Its first unplanned breakdown \u2014 statistically occurring within 18 months of heavy production use \u2014 can cost\u00a0<strong>USD 15,000\u201340,000<\/strong>\u00a0in lost production, rush orders, and expedited repair service.<\/p><p>Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) over a 10-year service life typically breaks down as:<\/p><table><thead><tr><th>TCO Component<\/th><th>Realistic Range<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Machine purchase price<\/td><td>30\u201340% of 10-yr TCO<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Labor (operators, maintenance technicians)<\/td><td>35\u201345% of 10-yr TCO<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Maintenance, wear parts, spare parts<\/td><td>10\u201320% of 10-yr TCO<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Downtime-related losses<\/td><td>5\u201315% of 10-yr TCO<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Installation, training, validation<\/td><td>5\u201310% of 10-yr TCO<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><p>Source:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.canadianpackaging.com\/features\/the-true-cost-of-filling-equipment\/\">Canadian Packaging \u2014 The True Cost of Filling Equipment<\/a><\/p><h3>Food-Grade Stainless Steel: The Engineering That Enables 10+ Years of Service<\/h3><p>High-quality filling machines are constructed with\u00a0<strong>Acier inoxydable 316L<\/strong>\u00a0(not the lower-grade 304 SS used in budget equipment) for all product-contact surfaces. 316L provides superior corrosion resistance against chloride-containing formulations, acidic product ingredients (pH &lt; 5), and aggressive CIP cleaning chemicals. The difference in surface longevity is not theoretical: facilities running abrasive cosmetic pastes (zinc oxide sunscreens, exfoliating creams) on 304 SS components report measurable surface pitting within 18\u201324 months; 316L components in the same environment run 8\u201312 years before requiring surface reconditioning.<\/p><p>With\u00a0<strong>proper preventive maintenance<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 including quarterly seal inspections, servo drive diagnostics every 6 months, and annual jaw face replacement \u2014 high-quality industrial tube filling machines routinely achieve\u00a0<strong>10+ years of productive service life<\/strong>\u00a0with consistent fill weight accuracy.<\/p><h3>Wear Parts and Maintenance Planning<\/h3><p>Critical wear components and realistic replacement intervals on a high-quality filling machine:<\/p><ul><li><strong>Piston pump seals and O-rings:<\/strong>\u00a0every 3\u20136 months (abrasive products) to 12 months (standard cosmetic creams)<\/li><li><strong>Sealing jaw heating elements:<\/strong>\u00a0annually<\/li><li><strong>Nozzle check valves:<\/strong>\u00a0every 6\u201312 months<\/li><li><strong>Conveyor belts:<\/strong>\u00a0every 2\u20133 years<\/li><\/ul><p>Ask every supplier to provide a\u00a0<strong>3-year spare parts forecast with unit pricing at time of quotation<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 not a generic &#8220;maintenance recommendation.&#8221; Suppliers who cannot provide this data will likely support you poorly when you need the parts.<\/p><hr \/><p><a title=\"toothpaste tube folding machine-Miyoda Machine\" href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/204745097@N06\/55475863050\/in\/dateposted-public\/\" data-flickr-embed=\"true\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/live.staticflickr.com\/65535\/55475863050_533b065827_b.jpg\" alt=\"toothpaste tube folding machine-Miyoda Machine\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" \/><\/a><\/p><p>\u00a0<em>316L stainless steel nozzle assembly with anti-drip valve \u2014 the component that determines both filling accuracy and product hygiene in cosmetic tube production. Source: Miyoda Packaging Machinery<\/em><\/p><hr \/><h2>8. Seamless Integration with Existing Production Lines<\/h2><h3>A Filling Machine Is One Station in a System<\/h3><p>The filling machine does not operate in isolation. In a complete cosmetic or pharmaceutical tube production line, it sits between the tube in-feed system and the downstream sealing, labeling, batch coding, and cartoning stations. A machine that cannot communicate with adjacent systems through standard industrial protocols creates manual staging bottlenecks that erase throughput gains from the filling stage itself.<\/p><p>High-quality filling machines designed for production line integration offer:<\/p><ul><li><strong>Standard conveyor interface heights<\/strong>\u00a0(typically 900\u2013950 mm) compatible with downstream labeling and cartoning equipment<\/li><li><strong>PLC handshake signals<\/strong>\u00a0(I\/O, Ethernet, OPC-UA) for upstream\/downstream system synchronization<\/li><li><strong>Modular mechanical design<\/strong>\u00a0that allows adding additional fill heads, vision inspection cameras, or checkweighers without replacing the base machine<\/li><\/ul><h3>OPC-UA Integration: The Industry Standard That Matters<\/h3><p>OPC-UA (Open Platform Communications Unified Architecture) is the industrial standard for machine data exchange \u2014 allowing fill weight data, alarm histories, and production counts to flow directly into your ERP or MES system. It is increasingly specified as a\u00a0<strong>mandatory requirement<\/strong>\u00a0by major cosmetic and pharmaceutical brand buyers (including multinational CPG companies) in their supplier qualification criteria, ensuring production data is traceable without manual entry.<\/p><p>A leading contract manufacturer in Southeast Asia reduced average weekly changeover time from 6.2 hours to 1.8 hours after implementing servo-driven jaw adjustment with HMI recipe management \u2014 recovering\u00a0<strong>228 additional production hours per year<\/strong>\u00a0without additional headcount.<\/p><h3>Modular Architecture and Retrofitting<\/h3><p>The most commercially valuable integration feature is modularity. When commissioning a filling line, confirm whether additional fill heads can be added to the same base machine versus requiring a parallel second machine. For a brand projecting volume growth from 8 million to 18 million tubes in four years, adding a second fill head to an existing machine at approximately\u00a0<strong>USD 35,000<\/strong>\u00a0is materially different from purchasing a second complete machine at USD 120,000.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/\">Miyoda Packaging Machinery<\/a>\u00a0designs their tube filling and closing platforms with modular architecture \u2014 enabling production line upgrades including additional fill heads, integrated vision inspection, and automated tube in-feed systems without complete machine replacement. Their\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/produits\/tube-filling-closing-machine\/\">tube filling and closing machine portfolio<\/a>\u00a0is engineered specifically for cosmetic and pharmaceutical production environments where integration with existing manufacturing infrastructure is a baseline requirement.<\/p><hr \/><h2>9. Regulatory-Driven ROI: How Compliance Protects Revenue<\/h2><h3>The Hidden Revenue Impact of Non-Compliance<\/h3><p>Regulatory non-compliance in tube filling operations does not manifest as a fine \u2014 it manifests as blocked contracts. A Southeast Asian cosmetic producer committed to a USD 35,000 semi-automatic tube filler in early 2024 based on lowest quoted price. Eighteen months later, a European distributor&#8217;s audit flagged the absence of electronic batch records, blocking a\u00a0<strong>USD 1.2 million annual contract<\/strong>. The machine itself was performing adequately. The compliance infrastructure it could not support was the failure point.<\/p><p>A filling machine with built-in GMP compliance features does not eliminate regulatory work \u2014 but it removes the most common sources of audit findings: inconsistent batch documentation, fill weight records that cannot be reconstructed after the fact, and cleaning records that exist only as handwritten logs.<\/p><h3>ROI Calculation: A Realistic Example<\/h3><p>For a pharmaceutical contract manufacturer producing 8 million tubes per year, upgrading from two semi-automatic lines (4 operators per shift) to one fully automatic line (1 operator per shift) at a blended labor rate of USD 22\/hour across 2 shifts, 250 operating days:<\/p><p>$$\\text{Annual Labor Savings} = 3 \\text{ operators} \\times $22\/\\text{hr} \\times 16 \\text{ hrs\/day} \\times 250 \\text{ days} = $264{,}000$$<\/p><p>$$\\text{Annual Waste Recovery} = 0.025 \\times 8{,}000{,}000 \\text{ tubes} \\times $0.10\/\\text{tube} = $20{,}000$$<\/p><p>$$\\text{Total Investment (machine + installation + validation)} = $120{,}000$$<\/p><p>$$\\text{Payback Period} = \\frac{$120{,}000}{$264{,}000 + $20{,}000} \\approx 5.1 \\text{ months}$$<\/p><p>At that production volume, the automatic machine pays for itself in under 6 months \u2014 and then generates its full capital value in labor and waste savings every subsequent year of its 10+ year service life.<\/p><hr \/><h2>10. Support, Service, and Partnership for Long-Term Success<\/h2><h3>What &#8220;After-Sales Support&#8221; Actually Means in Practice<\/h3><p>When a filling machine sealing jaw fails during a production run of 40,000 pharmaceutical ointment tubes, the relevant metric is not when a technician can &#8220;probably&#8221; be available \u2014 it is the contractual response time guarantee and the nearest stocked spare parts depot. Ask every supplier two questions before signing a purchase order:<\/p><ol><li><strong>What is your committed response time for critical production stoppages?<\/strong><\/li><li><strong>Where is your nearest regional service center, and which critical spare parts are stocked within 48-hour shipping distance?<\/strong><\/li><\/ol><p>Suppliers who provide generic &#8220;we will support you&#8221; language without specific commitments will demonstrate that generality when you most need specificity.<\/p><h3>Remote Diagnostics and Predictive Maintenance<\/h3><p>Modern filling machines with IIoT (Industrial Internet of Things) connectivity allow supplier technical teams to access PLC diagnostic data remotely \u2014 diagnosing fill weight drift, servo alarm codes, and temperature calibration issues without dispatching an on-site engineer. Predictive maintenance algorithms analyzing motor current profiles and vibration signatures can flag component failures\u00a0<strong>15\u201320 minutes before they cause production stoppages<\/strong>, reducing unplanned downtime by\u00a0<strong>25\u201340%<\/strong>\u00a0compared to fixed-interval replacement schedules.<\/p><h3>Operator Training: The Investment That Protects Your Machine Investment<\/h3><p>A pharmaceutical production facility in Thailand lost 11 days of production in one quarter when their sole qualified filling machine operator was absent due to illness. Their machine was functional; their documented operator pool was not. Cross-training a minimum of two operators per machine \u2014 with their qualification documented in your training records \u2014 is a production continuity requirement, not an optional investment.<\/p><p>Structured operator training timelines for tube filling equipment:<\/p><ul><li><strong>Semi-automatic operation:<\/strong>\u00a01\u20133 days to reach competent sustained production rate<\/li><li><strong>Fully automatic line operation:<\/strong>\u00a02\u20134 weeks to reach independent operation, including PLC alarm diagnosis, HMI recipe management, servo drive parameters, and changeover sequencing<\/li><\/ul><p>Suppliers who provide\u00a0<strong>on-site commissioning training with qualification documentation<\/strong>\u00a0and video-based remote support programs eliminate a critical dependency on locally available specialist technicians \u2014 a significant operational advantage for facilities in markets where automation expertise is scarce.<\/p><h3>Choosing a Partner, Not Just a Supplier<\/h3><p><a href=\"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/contact-miyoda-tube-packing-machines\/\">Miyoda Packaging Machinery<\/a>\u00a0specializes exclusively in automated tube production lines for cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. Their engineering team works with producers globally \u2014 matching machine specification to tube format, output target, compliance requirements, and floor layout \u2014 and has documented client cases showing operational efficiency improvements of\u00a0<strong>30% or greater<\/strong>\u00a0following transition from semi-automatic to fully automated production lines.<\/p><p>For producers evaluating their first fully automatic filling investment, their\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/tube-filling-machine-buyers-guide-pharmaceutical-cosmetic-2026\/\">2026 Tube Filling Machine Buyer&#8217;s Guide<\/a>\u00a0provides scenario-by-scenario TCO analysis across production volumes, tube materials, and regulatory jurisdictions. Buyers who need to compare automation levels before committing will find the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/automatic-vs-semi-automatic-cosmetic-tube-filling-machine\/\">automatic vs. semi-automatic comparison guide<\/a>\u00a0directly applicable to their evaluation process.<\/p><hr \/><p><a title=\"toothpaste tube maker and filler-Miyoda Machine\" href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/204745097@N06\/55475588293\/in\/dateposted-public\/\" data-flickr-embed=\"true\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/live.staticflickr.com\/65535\/55475588293_c6462a38f4_b.jpg\" alt=\"toothpaste tube maker and filler-Miyoda Machine\" width=\"576\" height=\"1024\" \/><\/a><\/p><p><em>Real-time fill weight monitoring on a touchscreen HMI \u2014 the interface between operator oversight and servo-driven precision on a modern automatic tube filling line. Source: Miyoda Packaging Machinery<\/em><\/p><hr \/><h2>What a High-Quality Filling Machine Actually Delivers<\/h2><p>Every section of this guide traces back to the same economic logic: the premium cost of a well-engineered filling liquid machine is recovered \u2014 typically within 6\u201336 months depending on production volume \u2014 and then generates compounding returns through reduced labor, reduced waste, fewer compliance events, and the ability to win contracts that lower-specified equipment cannot satisfy.<\/p><p>The tube filling machine market is projected to grow from\u00a0<strong>De 2,1 milliards de dollars en 2025 \u00e0 3,1 milliards de dollars d'ici 2035<\/strong>\u00a0at a CAGR of 3.9% (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.futuremarketinsights.com\/reports\/tube-filling-machine-market\">Future Market Insights<\/a>). The brands and contract manufacturers who invest in precision filling infrastructure now will hold the audit-ready documentation, the fill weight Cpk data, and the production capacity headroom to take that market growth \u2014 while competitors are still managing fill weight drift with spreadsheets.<\/p><hr \/><h2>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)<\/h2><h3>How does a high-quality filling machine improve production accuracy?<\/h3><p>High-quality tube filling machines use servo-driven piston pumps with electronic fill weight monitoring to maintain fill accuracy within \u00b10.3\u20130.5% of target volume. This is achieved through closed-loop feedback between the checkweigher and the servo motor controlling piston stroke \u2014 automatically correcting drift in real time without operator adjustment. In practice, this means a Cpk of 1.5\u20132.0 compared to 0.9\u20131.2 on semi-automatic equipment \u2014 the difference between a 0.006% and 0.27% defect rate at scale.<\/p><h3>Can the machine handle both cosmetic and pharmaceutical-grade products?<\/h3><p>Yes \u2014 machines designed with 316L stainless steel product-contact surfaces, CIP circuits, and GMP-compliant sanitary design are suitable for both categories. The key operational difference is documentation: pharmaceutical production requires IQ\/OQ\/PQ qualification, electronic batch records compliant with FDA 21 CFR Part 11, and more stringent cleaning validation protocols. Many facilities run cosmetic and pharmaceutical products on the same machine with robust cross-contamination prevention SOPs and formal change control documentation.<\/p><h3>What types of products can be filled using this machine?<\/h3><p>High-quality tube filling machines handle the full viscosity range encountered in cosmetic and pharmaceutical production: free-flowing serums and toners (5\u201350 cP), standard lotions and cleansers (500\u20132,000 cP), creams and moisturizers (5,000\u201320,000 cP), thick ointments and pastes (50,000\u2013200,000 cP), and dense pharmaceutical creams and toothpaste (100,000\u2013500,000+ cP). Pump type \u2014 piston, gear, or rotary lobe \u2014 is matched to product viscosity at fill temperature, determined during the machine specification process.<\/p><h3>Is the machine suitable for different tube materials like aluminum, laminate, and plastic?<\/h3><p>Yes. Tube material determines the sealing method required: LDPE and ABL laminate tubes use hot-air sealing; PBL laminate tubes typically use ultrasonic sealing; aluminum tubes use mechanical crimping. Modern high-quality filling machines can be configured with interchangeable sealing stations \u2014 or designed with a primary sealing method plus tooling sets for secondary formats. Confirm tube material compatibility with the supplier at specification stage and request a witnessed Factory Acceptance Test with your actual tube substrate before accepting delivery.<\/p><h3>How long does installation and setup typically take?<\/h3><p>Standard setup for an automatic tube filling machine takes\u00a0<strong>4\u201312 weeks<\/strong>\u00a0from machine delivery to first commercial production run, depending on configuration complexity and facility readiness. High-speed multi-head systems with custom tooling and vision inspection can extend to 14\u201316 weeks. For pharmaceutical-grade validation, add 8\u201316 weeks for IQ\/OQ\/PQ execution after installation. The full timeline from purchase order to first validated pharmaceutical batch is realistically\u00a0<strong>28\u201340 weeks<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 plan product launch dates accordingly.<\/p><h3>Do you offer validation documentation (IQ\/OQ\/PQ) for pharmaceutical clients?<\/h3><p>Full IQ\/OQ\/PQ validation packages \u2014 including protocol templates, test execution support, and documentation review \u2014 are available for pharmaceutical clients. These should be confirmed as included scope at the time of purchase, not negotiated as an add-on after delivery. Budget USD 20,000\u2013100,000 for complete pharmaceutical qualification depending on machine complexity and the extent of customer-side engineering support involved.<\/p><h3>Can the machine be integrated with existing sealing and labeling systems?<\/h3><p>Yes. High-quality filling machines use standard industrial interfaces \u2014 including OPC-UA data protocols, Ethernet PLC handshake, and compatible conveyor transfer heights \u2014 allowing integration with upstream tube in-feed systems and downstream labeling, cartoning, and batch coding equipment. Confirm interface specifications with both the filling machine supplier and downstream equipment suppliers during system design, not during installation.<\/p><h3>What maintenance is required, and how often?<\/h3><p>A practical preventive maintenance schedule for a high-quality automatic filling machine includes: daily cleaning of product-contact surfaces and nozzle tips; weekly lubrication of indexing table bearings and inspection of sealing jaw faces; monthly fill weight calibration verification; quarterly piston seal inspection; and 6-monthly servo drive diagnostics and vision system calibration. Critical wear parts \u2014 nozzle check valves, piston seals, sealing jaw heating elements \u2014 should be stocked on-site per the supplier&#8217;s 3-year spare parts forecast. Automated maintenance alerts in modern machines notify operators of upcoming service intervals.<\/p><h3>Is operator training provided after purchase?<\/h3><p>Yes. Reputable suppliers provide on-site commissioning training covering machine startup, recipe management, in-process quality sampling, changeover procedures, cleaning protocols, and basic alarm diagnosis. For fully automatic lines, structured training covering PLC alarm diagnosis, servo drive parameters, and changeover sequencing takes 2\u20134 weeks to reach independent operation competence. Confirm training scope, duration, and qualification documentation in the purchase agreement \u2014 not after delivery.<\/p><h3>How does the machine reduce product waste during filling?<\/h3><p>Waste reduction is achieved through four engineering features: drip-free anti-drip nozzles with precision cut-off that eliminate post-fill nozzle drip; closed-loop fill weight monitoring that corrects dosing drift before off-weight tubes accumulate; automated CIP circuits that reduce changeover purge waste by 50\u201370%; and servo-controlled product pressure management that maintains consistent fill speed across the run, preventing air entrapment and associated rework. Combined, these features reduce waste from the 2\u20135% typical of manual filling to 0.3\u20131% of output.<\/p><h3>Can I switch between different tube sizes quickly?<\/h3><p>Yes, with stored HMI recipes and quick-release modular tooling. Fill volume adjustments on the same tube format take\u00a0<strong>1\u20132 minutes<\/strong>\u00a0via touchscreen recipe recall. Tube diameter changes with quick-release tooling sets complete in\u00a0<strong>25\u201345 minutes<\/strong>\u00a0on well-designed automatic systems \u2014 compared to 45\u201390 minutes on older mechanical-adjustment designs. Full format and product changes including CIP cleaning typically run\u00a0<strong>60\u201390 minutes<\/strong>\u00a0total.<\/p><h3>What is the expected lifespan of the machine?<\/h3><p>With proper preventive maintenance, high-quality filling machines constructed from 316L stainless steel with wear-resistant valve components achieve\u00a0<strong>10+ years of productive service life<\/strong>. Budget equipment using 304 SS and standard-grade seals may require major mechanical overhaul within 4\u20136 years of heavy production use. The 10-year TCO comparison consistently favors high-quality equipment: lower per-unit cost, fewer unplanned stoppages, and longer intervals between capital replacement.<\/p><h3>Are spare parts readily available for quick replacement?<\/h3><p>This is the most underestimated procurement risk in filling machine purchasing. Specify contractually which spare parts the supplier will maintain in regional inventory and what the committed lead time is for critical components. A supplier whose nearest warehouse is 8 weeks away for critical nozzle assemblies is a production continuity risk that no warranty coverage resolves. Ask for a\u00a0<strong>3-year spare parts forecast with unit pricing<\/strong>\u00a0at quotation stage and confirm regional stocking commitments before signing the purchase agreement.<\/p><h3>How does this machine help meet regulatory requirements?<\/h3><p>GMP-compliant filling machines support regulatory requirements through design features rather than procedural workarounds: 316L stainless steel product-contact surfaces meet FDA 21 CFR and EU GMP material standards; automated electronic batch records satisfy data integrity requirements under\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/regulatory-information\/search-fda-guidance-documents\/part-11-electronic-records-electronic-signatures-scope-and-application\">FDA 21 CFR, partie 11<\/a>; CIP circuits support cleaning validation under EU GMP Annex 15; and fill weight Cpk data provides the process capability evidence required in pharmaceutical batch release and supplier qualification audits.<\/p><hr \/><h2>Glossaire des termes cl\u00e9s<\/h2><table><thead><tr><th>Term<\/th><th>Definition<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cpk<\/strong><\/td><td>Process Capability Index \u2014 measures how consistently fill weight stays within specification limits. Pharma standard: Cpk \u2265 1.33.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>OEE<\/strong><\/td><td>Overall Equipment Effectiveness = Availability \u00d7 Performance \u00d7 Quality. World-class: 85\u201392%.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>CIP<\/strong><\/td><td>Clean-in-Place \u2014 automated chemical flushing of product surfaces without machine disassembly.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>316L SS<\/strong><\/td><td>Food\/pharma-grade stainless steel with superior corrosion resistance; standard for pharmaceutical-grade filling equipment.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>IQ\/OQ\/PQ<\/strong><\/td><td>Installation, Operational, and Performance Qualification \u2014 the three-stage validation protocol required for pharmaceutical equipment.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>OPC-UA<\/strong><\/td><td>Open Platform Communications Unified Architecture \u2014 industrial standard for machine data exchange with ERP\/MES systems.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>ABL<\/strong><\/td><td>Aluminum Barrier Laminate \u2014 multi-layer tube combining plastic squeezability with near-zero oxygen transmission barrier.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>PBL<\/strong><\/td><td>Plastic Barrier Laminate \u2014 multi-layer tube using EVOH polymer barrier; fully recyclable alternative to ABL.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>TCO<\/strong><\/td><td>Total Cost of Ownership \u2014 complete cost over equipment lifespan including purchase, labor, maintenance, downtime, and validation.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>FAT<\/strong><\/td><td>Factory Acceptance Test \u2014 a formal production trial at the vendor&#8217;s facility before machine shipment, confirming it meets agreed specification.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>cGMP<\/strong><\/td><td>Current Good Manufacturing Practice \u2014 FDA and WHO regulatory standards for pharmaceutical manufacturing environments and equipment.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>LOTO<\/strong><\/td><td>Lockout\/Tagout \u2014 safety procedure for de-energizing equipment before maintenance to prevent accidental startup.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Benefits of Investing in a High-Quality Filling Liquid Machine The tube packaging market is growing fast \u2014 valued at\u00a0USD 13.43 billion in 2025\u00a0and projected to reach\u00a0USD 21.9 billion by 2033\u00a0at a CAGR of 6.2% (Grand View Research). For cosmetic and pharmaceutical tube producers, that growth is both an opportunity and a pressure test. Orders [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5423,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"Benefits of Investing in a High-Quality Filling Liquid Machine","_seopress_titles_desc":"Discover how a high-quality filling liquid machine boosts accuracy, cuts waste, ensures compliance, and drives ROI for cosmetic & pharma tube producers.","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[64,65,59],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5422","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-company-news","category-tube-packaging-industry-trends-market-insights","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5422","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5422"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5422\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5427,"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5422\/revisions\/5427"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5423"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5422"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5422"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miyodamachine.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5422"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}